Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 2801 - 2820 of 32,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2015, 2:39 pm
United States(1961) 368 U.S.208, 229 (Black, J., dissenting). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:17 am
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit will review the appeal.To date, four other United States District Courts have ruled on the constitutionality of the Individual Mandate (see, Liberty Univ., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
United States (Alvarez Machain II), 266 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
As many as 450,000 people locked up in the United States have not been convicted of anything. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm by Erin Miller
  Justice Stevens wrote a concurrence in this Term’s case, United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 9:14 am by Will Baude
(Will Baude) Justice Scalia’s opinion today in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:59 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States decided United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:37 pm
Denniston notes several statements in which Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and others forecast that the Supreme Court case of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:14 pm
Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483, is less than 4,000 words.The Declaration of Independence is 1,458 words, including signatures.The Gettysburg address is approximately 270 words.the United States Supreme Court decision by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm by Erin Miller
  Justice Stevens’s Rasul opinion carefully dissected the precedents on habeas jurisdiction outside the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:12 am by Julia Zebley
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that when the law for what constitutes a legal search changes between a search and an accompanying trial, the evidence is not excluded. [read post]