Search for: "United States v. Was" Results 2801 - 2820 of 102,811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part IV: Justice Sotomayor and Kagan get the line between national power and federalism
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
The first installment focused on Justice Gorsuch's colloquies about Officers of the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets ‘Office under the United States’; Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy; But Mitchell’s concern about Foreign Emoluments Clause ‘boomerang’ could have cut off a path of complete victory.”
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm by Howard Bashman
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
[Eugene Volokh] Associational Standing Isn't Defeated by Pseudonymity in Members' Declarations
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case  and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
United States: the states are disabled from legislating in this area of federal interest. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
SCOTUS dispatch: ‘in the room where it happened’ for the oral arguments in the Trump v. Anderson ballot disqualification case
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm by Marissa Zupancic | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
  On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
Broad Bayh-Dole March-In Licensing Rights Affirmed in Alzheimer’s Mouse Patent Dispute
9 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States, 22-2248 (Fed. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Eleventh Circuit Finds No Error in judge Directing Jurors to Resolve a "Metaphysically Impossible" Verdict
9 Feb 2024, 12:39 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
For example, in the recent case, United States v. [read post]
EvidenceProf Blog - https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/evidenceprof/
Weekly SSRN Tax Article Review And Roundup: Roberts Reviews New Articles On Moore v. United States By Avi-Yonah & Clarke
9 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm by Tracey Roberts
This week, Tracey M. [read post]
TaxProf Blog - https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Overruling Chevron and FDA Decision-Making, by Nikhil Chaudhry, Dr. Reshma Ramachandran, and Dr. Joseph Ross
9 Feb 2024, 11:08 am by Guest Author
Co v. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets ‘Officers of the United States’; Justice Gorsuch demonstrates that he is the Court’s most careful, consistent textualist.”
9 Feb 2024, 10:34 am by Howard Bashman
Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets ‘Officers of the United States’; Justice Gorsuch demonstrates that he is the Court’s most careful, consistent textualist. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets "Officers of the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
SEC Whistleblower Protection Upheld By The U.S. Supreme Court
9 Feb 2024, 7:29 am by Silver Law Group
UBS Securities LLC et al., case number 22-660, before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
SEC Whistleblower Lawyer Blog - http://www.secwhistleblowerlawyers.net/
From Louboutin to Pink Insulation: How Can a Company Trademark a Color?
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Sarah Friedman
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
In Custodia Legis - http://blogs.loc.gov/law
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson: Collected Posts
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am by Marty Lederman
Below are links to the complete series of my posts on Trump v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
“The Spirit of Aloha”: The Hawaii Supreme Court Challenges the U.S. Supreme Court Over Gun Rights
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am by jonathanturley
On Wednesday,  in State v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
:@WilliamBaude: Is Congress A "Backstop"?
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am by Will Baude
  In the course of considering certain "Special Situations" (p. 29), we consider who all might have authority to enforce Section Three with respect to the constitutional ineligibility of an individual for the office of President of the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
News Roundup
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
  See State v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
The Making of a Myth: Big Tech, Billionaires, and the Wild West
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm by Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
Unlike Europe’s comprehensive privacy law, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the United States only has a conglomeration of laws that target specific types of data. [read post]
Law, Technology & Arts Blog - http://wjlta.wordpress.com/
When can a libel be defended as honest opinion? – Percy Preston
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/