Search for: "Walker, in Re" Results 2801 - 2814 of 2,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
The Fourth Circuit in an unpublished opinion, Derrick Walker v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 6:56 am
The UM contract is causing other local employers, notably FIU, to re-evaluate their employment agreements. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 5:00 am
  (I am soon to re-articulate my position with respect to attorneys  at an upcoming conference at Columbia - mark your calendar.) [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 11:30 am
  And that's the point -- if you're told something is non-fiction, and it seems outrageous and unbelievable, well, assuming the author has credibility, you open your mind and you accept it. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 8:45 am
From: Ron Walker ronald.walker@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 7:49 PMTo: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
BAP 1998) (Section 105(a), and not section 362(h), was employed because the trustee is not an "individual" within the meaning ofsection 362(h)); In re Elder-Beerman Stores Corp., 206 B.R. 142, 152 (S.D.Ohio 1997); and, In re Stockbridge Funding Corp., 145 B.R. 797, 813 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (stating a trustee cannot receive damages under 362(h)), among other court's taking the same stance. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
However, the House of Lords explained yesterday that it had never held that severe crimes could not be acts of state in the sense of the rule of immunity ratione materiae (Lord Hoffmann, at paras. 86-88), and Lord Bingham doubted (at para. 19) whether Pinochet (No. 1) still possessed any value as precedent, having been set aside for procedural reasons (In re Pinochet [2000] 1 AC 119) and superseded by Pinochet (No. 3). [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am by Frodnesor
Ga. 3/6/06), the court, like in In re Horn, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 416314 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am by Frodnesor
Ga. 3/6/06), the court, like in In re Horn, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 416314 (Bankr. [read post]
20 Mar 2006, 3:17 pm
Only one, or one too many if you're the cruise line. [read post]