Search for: "Waters v. United States"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 4,953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm
” Most of the surface waters of the United States will fail the generic E. coli standard either persistently, predictably during certain times of the year or intermittently. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:38 am
On the other hand, as the record is made by the United States government and must be filed with the Court, it seems there should be a logical (though not legal) assumption that it reflects the facts as CBP found them. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:08 am
Finally, the vulnerabilities had to be “made and used” in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 1:57 pm
Garland and Firebaugh v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:52 pm
Second, the United States is no ordinary litigant. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:55 pm
”Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, Knudsen notes that the Supreme Court has addressed the meaning of “waters of the United States” in the Clean Water Act four separate times—most recently in Sackett v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:50 pm
Before the United State District Court of Missouri, Eastern Division (the “Court”) was the City’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 10:20 pm
Manuel Barba v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:03 am
Well, here’s another try: the 404 permit under the Clean Water Act, required in order to discharge any dredged of fill material into the waters of the United States (and thus required to fill any wetlands). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
Although some scholars may disagree, Hague V and Hague XIII generally reflect CIL binding on all states. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:32 am
United States, involves the Territory of Guam’s efforts to require the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:35 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of Toraane and another) v… [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 1:07 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeSuppression Denied Despite Wiretap Applications' Misidentification of Controlled Substance as Khat United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:37 am
Mission The Permanent Mission of the Republic of Estonia to the United Nations v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
United States Issue: Does United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
BACKGROUND: Plaintiff Butte Environmental Council filed a complaint against Defendants United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”). [read post]
