Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 29,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 12:44 pm
Justice Sotomayor with opinion in Herrera v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:41 am
The Supreme Court broadened the scope of the exception in 2014 with Burwell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:19 am
On April 19, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Jessica Jacobson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:36 pm
This does not bode well for the future of Brown v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm
But race pervades the rest of the court’s docket as well. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States on Wednesday heard oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:06 am
Call me reactionary but I like a well-designed uniform. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court has granted a petition to hear the controversial case of American Electric Power Company Inc., et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:20 am
Facts: – This case (A.H., et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:20 am
If the Court deemed Aereo's transmissions a "public performance," the questioning went, how could they prevent sweeping up these kinds of services as well? [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:55 pm
All that the Ninth Circuit did on the merits, the brief said, was to closely apply the Supreme Court’s decision in Romer v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Roberts v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
His conclusion for the Court – joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan – in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:08 am
Supreme Court this morning, in a victory for pro-life pregnancy centers, decided National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:21 am
Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:20 pm
Part I reviews the facts in Christian Legal Society as well as the Opinion of the Court, the two concurrences, and the four Justice dissent. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
ASARCO’s argument is well done in every way, and the brief summary probably doesn’t do it justice. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am
Such an expansive reading of “Manner” is thus contrary both to the plain meaning of the Constitutional text and common sense.Oddly, the Court relies on Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in Chiafalo v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm
Justice Liu's concurrence (joined by Justice Kennard) has a point as well. [read post]
