Search for: "47 DEFENDANTS"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 4,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 8:39 pm
Id. at 47. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am
CVS Corp., 571 F.3d 238, 246-47 (2d Cir. 2009) (noting presumption in trademark cases, without referencing eBay or Salinger, but finding that even without benefit of presumption, plaintiff had shown irreparable injury). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
47 Consequently, it must be concluded that, by granting a licence, the proprietor of a trade mark confers on the licensee, within the limits set by the clauses of the licensing contr [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
CVS Corp., 571 F.3d 238, 246-47 (2d Cir. 2009) (noting presumption in trademark cases, without referencing eBay or Salinger, but finding that even without benefit of presumption, plaintiff had shown irreparable injury). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:43 pm
On August 1, 2012, HB 47 will go into effect. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
In this case, the InterDigital complaint asserts the defendants are infringing U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:25 am
In the result, the front of her car struck the plaintiff. [47] The defendant’s submission that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent is superficially attractive - after all, her car was there to be seen. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:24 am
” Though the underlying complaint did not allege disparagement directly, the implication was sufficient to trigger a duty to defend under the policies’ advertising coverage. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:24 am
” Though the underlying complaint did not allege disparagement directly, the implication was sufficient to trigger a duty to defend under the policies’ advertising coverage. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The defender did not appear at the hearing on which the final order was pronounced. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The defender did not appear at the hearing on which the final order was pronounced. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Rosenthal, 210 AD2d 47 (1st Dept 1994), and Dawson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
Rule 52(b) [plain error] normally requires the same kind of inquiry, with one important difference: It is the defendant rather than the Government who bears the burden of persuasion with respect to prejudice. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 6:20 pm
Wet Seal operates about 470 of its namesake stores and 83 Arden B Stores in 47 U.S. states and Puerto Rico. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
The knowledge element does not need to be proven, but if the defendant puts it at issue, then the jury is going to hear about it, and the defendant must work to rebut the presumption. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:28 pm
Plaintiff brought suit, alleging that the confirmation text message he received was sent in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:28 pm
Plaintiff brought suit, alleging that the confirmation text message he received was sent in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
Superior Court (1996) 47 Cal. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:02 am
The LLC gave presentations in North Carolina and Virginia using the green BBP logo, describing itself as a nationally recognized firm with projects in 47 states and 4/5 countries, serving over 1250 clients. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 11:12 am
Doesn't 47 USC 230 preempt this claim? [read post]
