Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 10,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 1:47 am
United States, 242 U.S. 470 (1917) (Congress can use the interstate commerce power to criminalize interstate travel by people intending to engage in non-commercial extra-marital sex); Champion v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:35 am
This post was authored by Bradley Billing, Touro University, Jacob D. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Last June, the United States Supreme Court determined that blank">Crawford v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 5:34 am
ERISA lawyers will be watching this United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm
The Pakistani embassy in the United States warned the U.S. against using it as a “scapegoat” to explain challenges in Afghanistan. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:51 pm
In State v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:26 pm
The United States produced its first automobile in 1877, and the first traffic ticket issued in 1904. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am
At the Fed Soc Blog, James Burnham discusses United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:16 pm
The NSA conducts surveillance on foreign individuals living outside the United States by collecting communications both sent to and from them. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:31 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
The qui tam cases are captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm
RB (Algeria)-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10; [2009] 2 WLR 512 says not. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
It states that a site is not subject to action under the bill if it “engages in an activity that would not make the operator liable for monetary relief for infringing the copyright under section 512 of title 17, United States Code. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:15 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 8:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:59 pm
” The case is Kransky v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
Under the new law, those who may be tried by military commissions are described as "unprivileged enemy belligerents," theoretically a law-of-war term, but here meaning not only individuals who have actually "engaged in hostilities against the United States," but also individuals who have "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:28 am
The opinion, United States v. [read post]
