Search for: "Branch v. United States" Results 2821 - 2840 of 4,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Michael Stern
Although the PRA declares that “[t]he United States shall receive and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records,” it does not provide all executive officials with unfettered access to such records. [read post]
27 May 2017, 3:35 am by NCC Staff
United States, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes said the legal action against the Schechters violated the Constitution’s Commerce Clause because the chicken business was contained within New York State. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm by Donna Sokol
  A 1991 empirical study of congressional overrides of Supreme Court decisions found that 124 United States Supreme Court decisions were overridden between 1967-1990. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:29 am by Administrator
This commentary was first published in the Globe and Mail on Sept. 21, 2011.Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas is asking the United Nations to declare his country a state. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:31 am by Scott Bomboy
However, the President or Congress can exercise considerable powers at ports of entry to the United States. [read post]
29 May 2025, 3:35 am by SHG
But what of the chaos wreaked upon the United States and the rest of the world? [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 10:45 pm by Orin S. Kerr
It grants him the authority to remove from the United States foreign citizens he has designated as "alien enemies" in the cases of war or an invasion. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 10:23 am by Jon
The individuals or legal roles subject to the decisions.These are discussed in a classic treatise,  A Dissertation on the Nature and Extent of the Jurisdiction of the Courts of the United States, Peter Stephen Du Ponceau (1824). [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:04 am
 Pix Credit HEREThe folks over at the Völkerrechtsblog have posted an excellent essay by Andrew Forde (Visiting Fellow at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, Galway). [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:25 pm
  Under the [governing statute], a state-court decision can be set aside on federal habeas review only if it is "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm by Steven Schwinn
United States, doesn’t touch the constitutional issues brewing in the lower courts. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
The other decision was State v. [read post]