Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 34,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 3:10 pm
Larson (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted Four Exceptions in Search of a Theory: District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
The gravamen of the complaint is that defendants knowingly and “falsely” label beverage containers sold both inside and outside California with “CA CRV,” “California Redemption Value,” or similar labels when, in fact, under California law, only containers purchased inside California may be redeemed in California. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
By Michael Kun On Monday, June 25, 2011, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Coito v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:10 am
In Livingwell Medical Clinic, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:30 am
The court in Elliano v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:00 am
Richey v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:52 pm
By contrast, California law requires compensation for all time "during which an employee is subject to the control of an employer. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:52 pm
By contrast, California law requires compensation for all time "during which an employee is subject to the control of an employer. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:11 pm
For example, in Rodriquez v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:28 am
(See Kelly v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 4:15 am
In Roybal v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:37 am
Green v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 4:49 pm
California Vacation Laws California and federal laws do not require employers to provide employees with paid vacation. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:41 pm
In Augustus v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:21 am
State of California (Gaming Compacts – Good Faith Negotiations)James Raymond Acres v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:45 am
California law does not require employers to provide paid vacation. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
The DLSE has adopted the test which the California Supreme Court announced in the case of Madera Police Officers Assn. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:37 am
Marital privilege not available in administrative disciplinary actions taken against law enforcement personnelRiverside County Sheriff's Department v Astrid Megan Reynolds, Court of Appeal [California], 4th District, Division 2, Docket #E043187Astrid Megan Reynolds served as a deputy sheriff with the Riverside County [California] Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
