Search for: "County v. State" Results 2821 - 2840 of 33,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 10:09 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law Dissenting in a denial of certiorari today in County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The Court today issued a stay in G.G. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are new pleadings and orders: Nooksack Indian Tribe v NICS Order on Preliminary Injunction Whatcom County Superior Court Nooksack Indian Tribe’s Reply In Support of Motion to Vacate Order Domesticating Foreign Judgment and Quash or Bar Execution and Enforcement Efforts [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:03 am
In its published opinion in Marquette General Hosptial, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:09 am
On June 15th, 2020, The Supreme Court of the United States made a landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
But county officials told the sheriff to suspend the program this year after a case out of Los Angeles -- Pack v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 7:49 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Fulton County School District 13-307 Issue: Whether, when a plaintiff in federal court seeks to invoke nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel against a state or local government based on a prior state adjudication, the availability of collateral estoppel is governed by state or federal law; (2) whether, if federal law controls, United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:00 pm
Reading between the lines: "Qualified immunity appeals are difficult enough without the district court making it harder by merely stating: 'Motion denied.' When that's all we see, we can't tell if it's an insufficiency of the evidence problem (for which appeals are not available) or otherwise. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Christine Dowling
Worcester of Loudoun County, Virginia, whose decisions to reopen the cases of five immigrants directly contradict a recent ruling by the state's high court.Last month, the Virginia Supreme Court unanimously held in Commonwealth v. [read post]