Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
NYAG Proposed Settlement for Credential Stuffing Attacks with 3-Business-Day Access Request Response
23 Sep 2020, 5:40 am
(New York v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:08 am
The court’s opinion in Poole v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Wyrick, C. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:57 pm
Beard Research, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:53 am
(d) of the relevant user in the relevant Member State? [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
The new Common Practice explains that:“A change only in colour does not alter the distinctive character of the trade mark, as long as the following requirements are met: a) the word/figurative elements coincide and are the main distinctive elements; b) the contrast of shades is respected; c) colour or combination of colours does not possess distinctive character in itself and; d) colour is not one of the main contributors to the overall distinctiveness of the mark. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
The section 512(g) counter-notification process refers only to 512(c) hosting providers, not other OSPs (e.g., search engines), for starters. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
Supp. 3d 125, 127 (D. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:54 am
Mystic Blue Cruises, Inc., 11 C 1986 (Aug 9, 2012 N.D. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
In other words, even if the Family Court removes a child who has not been neglected or abused, it has jurisdiction to continue that child's placement in foster care until and unless it decides otherwise. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
This included, without limitation, restraining them from using any such words or trade marks: (a) As part of any logo or otherwise in signage in or about any restaurant or related menus, business cards or other in-restaurant promotional materials; (b) In any other ex-restaurant promotional materials; (c) On the website located at www.fatduckcatering.com.au; (d) In the domain name fatduckcatering.com.au; (e) In any catalogue or other promotional materials concerning fat… [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm
In today's Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm
In today's Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, pet. ref'd) (citing Limon v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
Rooming House Act did not apply to Assisted Living Facility here ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, by and through BRIAN BURNS, EXECUTOR,v CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC d/b/a CARE ONE HARMONY VILLAGE AT MOORESTOWN and CARE ONE, LLC,SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
Otherwise, why bother? [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
In Torres v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am
"Robin S. agreed to prohibit any contact between the parents and the children and to advise the Dona Ana County District Attorney's Office in the event that the parents attempted to remove the children from her care or otherwise to contact the children in any way. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 10:19 pm
Circuit’s March 2, 2010 decision in Teva Pharms USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
He claimed that the officials acted with deliberate indifference in denying him treatment for Hepatitis C. [read post]
