Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C." Results 2821 - 2840 of 3,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2018, 12:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Not only did the action challenge the entire legality of retail beer distribution in Ontario, it disputed the constitutionality of legislative action of the government in their claim as follows: [47] In their proposed class action, the Plaintiffs sought damages of $1.4 billion, and punitive damages of $5 million for the following causes of action: (a) damages pursuant to s. 36 of the Competition Act[7] for contravention of s. 45 of the Act, which has two versions over the class… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm by FDABlog HPM
  There is a 75% refund of the application (original ANDA and PAS) fee if an application is not received, see Proposed FDC Act § 744G(a)(3)(D); however, such an application will be subject to [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:18 pm
This isn’t about hatred. [read post]
2 May 2010, 4:25 am by sevach
Hay que optar por la respuesta cuyo orden ( A,B,C,D)  sea la que mas sirve, en una visión de conjunto de todas las respuestas dadas, a mantener el  equilibrio cuantitativo entre las distintas respuestas de los ejercicios que suele imponer el Tribunal. 9º   No se fije  en la oveja negra. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:07 am by admin
TRI-METHYL X capsules, vitamin C 60 mg, Vitamin B-12 24 mcg, 60-count bottles, UPC 089935100214. e-pol capsules, 30 mg, InSLINsified Proprietary Insulin Mimetic 250.5 mg, 60-count bottles, UPC 855279025144. [read post]
They even went to some length to deliver a wide-ranging decision which makes several points about: a) free evaluation of evidence, b) the burden of proof for technical effects, c) the concept of plausibility, d) post-published evidence in the context of inventive step, and e) post-published evidence in the context of sufficiency. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]