Search for: "Dean v. Dean"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 3,697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Riley challenged this action as racially discriminatory under Batson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 12:19 am
***Note the post on Patently-O about Microsoft Corp. v. z4 Tech. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
” Justice Ginsberg, Professor Mary Radford, and Dean Knowles converse after the Miller Lecture. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Under the facts of this hypothetical case (stylized as McCain v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
"It appears that at least some in the Senate also support adding trustees.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am
Orwig, Lee Anderson, Andrea Ryan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:05 am
Scachitti v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:08 pm
Corrales v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:19 pm
In addition to their recent paper, Revesz and his co-authors have filed an amicus brief in support of EPA in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 4:33 am
In 1998 the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled on the case of National Media Limited v Bogoshi and changed the law. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:54 am
Her widely cited dissenting opinion in Kelo v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:23 pm
Even one person who ended up as dean here at UNC -- and the building where I work is now named after him. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:25 am
Gazette, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am
The first court decision discussing a delayed notice search warrant—that is to say, a covert search actually authorized in advance by a magistrate—is United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 4:22 am
***After the Supreme Court’s decision in Worcester v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 6:24 pm
I searched for the quote, using the NYT's archive search function, and what came up was: IHTPressEngine v. 1.3.12 2011-06-02T12:49:18-0400 A legal fight ... [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 12:35 pm
This decision was made in the shadow of Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 12:06 pm
Democrats were very upset at Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 12:27 pm
As far back as 1977, however, the Supreme Court noted in Bates v. [read post]
