Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 2821 - 2840 of 27,641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2023, 4:23 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
According to the Supreme Court, it follows from the above-mentioned case law of the CJEU that “when the marketing authorization does not qualify a substance as an “active principle”, it is rebuttably presumed that this substance does not produce its own pharmacological, immunological or metabolic effect covered by the therapeutic indications referred to in that marketing authorization”. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm by Josh Blackman
[Justice Kavanaugh's six-page majority opinion does not withstand scrutiny against Justice Thomas's 20-page dissent.] [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 2:41 pm by Shea Denning
Though G.S. 20-19 does not define a criminal charge resulting from its violation, violating such a restriction runs afoul of G.S. 20-7(e). [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:50 am
Mercy Hospital, Inc., 2007 WL 2083562, *3 (S.D.Fla.07/20/2007). [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:39 am
New York's Judiciary Law 474-a sets out the fees lawyers may charge in medical malpractice cases: 30% of the first $250,000 recovered, 25% on the next $250,000, 20% on the next $500,000, 15% on the next $250,000 and 10% on any amount recovered over $1,250,000. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 6:24 am
After screening 2,481 articles, the meta-analysis included 28 international studies (20 case-controlled, 8 cohorts) totaling 9,587 NHL patients. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:30 am by Erin Kristofco
The Court noted agreement with the Colorado Court of Appeals1 that a one year time limit does not bar tort claims based on bad faith. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:16 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
" Therefore, a victim of breach under the new regime would have the following options:seek substituted performance under the new S. 20,seek specific performance under the new S. 10, if he has not sought substituted performance under the new S. 14, orclaim damages or liquidated damages [the new S 20(1) on substituted performance starts off with the phrase "without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in the Indian Contract Act, 1872... [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:27 pm by WIMS
  THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS- Senate Hearing On Updating & Modernizing TSCA- EPA Launches "Sustainable Communities Building Blocks"- DOE's Chu Touts ARPA-E Projects & Upcoming Summit - DOE Facilitating High-Efficiency Commercial Air Conditioners- DOE's Energy Innovation Portal Tops 300 Market Ideas- Dioxin Review Panel Teleconference March 1 & 2- USGS Research Will Improve Climate Models- Senators Introduce… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Nowhere in the statute nor in the regulations does it at all indicate that entire classifications of employees are forestalled from being considered for L-1B transfers. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Nowhere in the statute nor in the regulations does it at all indicate that entire classifications of employees are forestalled from being considered for L-1B transfers. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Marty Lederman
Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), held that under Article I, Section 2, total population is the only appropriate apportionment base for congressional apportionment. [read post]