Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 2821 - 2840 of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
” He also said that Twitter users in England and Wales were not exempt from the requirement to observe privacy orders. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 11:40 pm by Patti Waller
Abstract available online at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18494694 Benson, V. and Merano, M.A., “Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey 1995,” VITAL HEALTH STATISTICS, SERIES 10 (Nat’l Center for Health Statistics 1998). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:10 pm by INFORRM
This may significantly impact on privacy laws across all Europe’s contracting states. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Independent Schools Council and the Charity Commission for England and Wales (Defendant), National Council for Voluntary Organisations and the Education Review Group (Interveners); Attorney General v Charity Commissioner for England and Wales (Referrer) and the Independent Schools Council (Respondents) [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC) – read judgment  It is not for the Charity Commission or the courts to impose on trustees of a school their own idea of what is for the… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
During Reconstruction, Democrats bitterly condemned how state equality in the Senate gave disproportionate power to New England states that were far more anti-slavery and racially egalitarian than the rest of the country. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
 A short while ago, in "Faccenda Chickens rule the roost as judge nips Caterpillar in the bud" (here), the IPKat reported on the decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat (Queen's Bench Division, England and Wales) in Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Huesca de Crean [2011] EWHC 3154, an IP-based that ended up in a non-IP court because of its heavily contract law-based content. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am by INFORRM
In the Spycatcher cases in England and Australia the British Government sought to restrain the release of the memoirs from the disgruntled former spy Peter Wright. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Kay Marbiah
  As the Master of Rolls stated on the launch of the 2022 Blockchain Legal & Regulatory Guidance[8]: “every lawyer will require familiarity with the blockchain, smart legal contracts and cryptoassets. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
  In R v Legal Aid Board, ex p Kaim Todner ([1999] QB 966), the Court stated that it was important not to forget why proceedings need to be held under the full glare of a public hearing because there was a natural tendency for the general principle to be eroded. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Events On 29 November 2022, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is hosting a virtual talk on “Contemporary First Amendment Politics” at the California State University. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Andrew Hamm
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]