Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 27,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
Gupta v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
For current practitioners, where the book shines is in the chapter entitled “Fairness in Context: Achieving Fairness Through Access to Administrative Justice”. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:51 am
The case of Carmer v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:05 pm
Pliler and Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
Among other things, the article discusses the split in authority among federal courts over who bears the burden of proving that the "home state" and "local controversy" exceptions to CAFA removal jurisdiction are present: The Class Action Fairness Act has created confusion over who has the burden of proof to show why a case filed in state court should or should not be moved to federal court. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:33 am
NMCCA just updated its posted argument schedule to reflect a second case argued this past week: United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:38 pm
Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
Smith v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
We are planning a series of posts on the DC Circuit's decision in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
We are here to present the findings of our recently published study, Kansas Tax Modernization: A Framework for Stable, Fair, Pro-growth Reform. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:16 am
Not all of the lethal injection attention is focused on Baze v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:09 pm
Therefore, employers complying with state law minimum wages will not have to worry about the FLSA when constructing tip pools.The case is Cumbie v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:11 pm
Second, the court based the decision, at least in part, on the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Encino Motor Cars, LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
C and E, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am
When the Supreme Court re-calibrated the fair use analysis to focus on transformativeness in Campbell v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation" - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat)… [read post]
