Search for: "French v. French" Results 2821 - 2840 of 4,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
An early example of the Great British double entendre Zoe Renault v Renault Zoe. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:46 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
” • Pia Letto-Vanamo, University of Helsinki, “Some Remarks on the History of Legal Argumentation” • Michael A Livingston, Rutgers School of Law, “One Hatred, Many Laws: The Evolution of Antisemitic Laws in Germany, France, and Italy in Comparative Historical Perspective” • Lara Magnusdottir, University of Iceland, “How to understand a Concordat when you don‘t know what the word means” • Aniceto Masferrer, University of Valencia,… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy and Information Law Blog notes that the French data protection authority, CNIL, has sent formal letters of enforcement to 20 copies requesting them to comply with cookie rules in France. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:47 am
Section I of the French IP Code requires a work to merely be one which involves application of mind and for it to be an expression in material form. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
Lawyered podcast and from David French at National Review. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
Cumming v Danson [1942] 2 All ER 653 and Enfield LBC v French cited. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am by Matthias Weller
The French parent companies sought to sue the German banks in Paris, arguing that this was the place where they experienced the resulting financial loss. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:56 am
The article is an offshoot of a speech Steve recently gave for JP Morgan (Hong Kong) and it is entitled "Danone v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Feb. 24, 2009) (reversing directed verdict on punitive damages claims finding trial court applied incorrect legal standard, reasonable minds could differ as to recklessness of defendants, and liability for punitive damages could have been imposed indirectly on defendants as principal or employer); Estate of French v. [read post]