Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 44,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court issued its much anticipated opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 79 Fed. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 7:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 6:40 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
Male attorneys, it’s not a good idea to use the “V” word when referring to your female adversaries, and you might even be sanctioned for it. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 am
Equally a proper exercise of the discretion would only be triggered and conducted by an unequivocal finding that the objections had been made good. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
When Arizona’s Court of Appeals, Division Two came out with a related opinion in State v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
Benedict v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:11 pm
FTC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:42 am
The good news is that Twombly isn't constitutionally based. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:14 pm
In Good v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 10:01 am
Here's a combination that's never good: (1) delusional paranoia, and (2) an obsession with Molotov cocktails.Particularly in a guy who's previously been convicted of arson. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:15 am
Kodrin v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:15 am
Kodrin v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
The odds are good that we’re about to get one more, in a capital case out of the Eleventh Circuit, Lawrence Joseph Jefferson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 9:29 am
The FSC v. [read post]
