Search for: "I. C. " Results 2821 - 2840 of 55,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
Thanks to my friend Bill M, I was able to score the relevant portions of a typical auto policy (YMMV):"Exclusions:... to any automobile while used as a public or livery conveyance. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:46 am
C'mon - hookers and forms 1099? [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:27 am by Krzysztof Pacula
Those are the questions that the Court of justice addresses in its judgment handed down this morning in the case Beverage City Polska, C-832/21. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:32 am by Peter Hirtle
(by Peter Hirtle)On p. 195 of Copyright & Cultural Institutions (C&CI), I noted that “Court cases involving copyright infringement by cultural heritage institutions are rare. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Taylor might have leaned harder into what I regard as his stronger argument--that Section 1052(c) is viewpoint discriminatory in effect. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
The Victorian Society expressed “in trenchant terms” that complete pew removal was not sufficiently justified [7(c)]. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:25 pm
Thanks to this post at C&C, I see that The Tennessean has this notable article in which Governor Phil Bredesen's explains his resistance to changing the state's lethal injection protocol from the three-drug method to a one-drug method often touted by those objecting to the three-drug method. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 1:24 am
I recently represented a client physician who had been given a deferred disposition for Public Intoxication -a Class C misdemeanor. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:52 pm by Patrick
Because I wonder where you are, and I wonder what you do. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what Hawaii Administrative Rules §§ 13–300-1, –32(c) seems to say (though I’m not sure there’s any actual statutory authorization for this). [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:57 pm by charley foster
KIUC is charged with nine counts each of taking threatened species in violation of 16 USC §§ 1538(a)(1)(G) and 1540(b)(1) and Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, § 17.31(c) and (a); and taking migratory birds in violation of 16 USC §§ 703(a), 707(a).I haven't had time to do more than scan it and I'm no expert at environmental law - especially endangered species (we'll learn about it together as the case progresses) - but… [read post]