Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 3,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
State, 885 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 2004) .............................................................................. 4 Jones v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:48 am
"Even assuming the district court erred, . . . absent an opinion by this circuit or the Supreme Court on the issue in dispute, there is no plain error unless [the] district court failed to follow [an] ‘absolutely clear' legal norm . . . . [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
There, the district court found that (1) the ACLU had standing to challenge TSP; (2) the Fourth Amendment "requires prior warrants for any reasonable search," 438 F. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 10:49 pm
The Fourth District Court of Appeal's Div. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
The Fourth District Court of Appeal's Div. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 2:28 pm
The decision of Jones v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Example: A decision rendered by a United States District Court judge is generally referred to by the name of the parties, e.g., Jones v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 2:42 pm
Costello is an associate resident in the Atlanta office of Jones Day. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:08 am
On July 1, 2008 the much anticipated District Court decision in the Jones v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:49 pm
Rallos, 2008 Westlaw 2550728 (Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, 3rd Division, June 25, 2008), and Hwang v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
June 23, 2008) .................................... 3-4, 15-16 Jones v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:42 am
The suit was filed on June 27 in Jefferson County District Court under the Jones Act. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:10 pm
On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court decided the District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 4:34 am
The immediate sentencing issue in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
State, 885 So.2d 338 (Fla. 2004) .................5, 15 Jones v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
Jones, No. 05-5879 "Sentence for unlawful possession of cocaine base is vacated in part where ambiguities in the sentencing record suggested that the district court was uncertain about its authority with respect to the Guideline rules as provided under Kimbrough and Gall" CIVIL PROCEDURE, COMMERCIAL LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE, SECURITIES LAW Eberhard v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Jones, in the district court is posted here. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:08 am
Supreme Court held in Jones v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:18 am
Corey Jones and Jason JonesU.S. [read post]
