Search for: "London, Appeal of"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 5,582
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
The Kat now has it on the excellent authority of none other than Merpel herself that the appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal, after that noble court had considered the ground of appeal with a suitably straight set of faces for a full five minutes. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 pm
Obama, the force feeding case on appeal in the D.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:38 am
Kokopenace, the Ontario Court of Appeal highlighted the government’s duty to make reasonable efforts to include First Nations members on jury rolls.But in Kennedy, it’s fairly clear officials did just that. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:46 am
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:37 am
Although the Court of Appeal gave permission for an appeal, the parties settled and so there was no grand finale to this controversial copyright case. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 10:05 am
” The “Naked Rambler” Stephen Gough lost his appeal in the High Court. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner) Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to… [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
Legal jobs & lawyer recruitment in London appears to be on the up. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
Legal jobs & lawyer recruitment in London appears to be on the up. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am
On Tuesday 29 October 2013 in Courtroom 2 is the expedited appeal of West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:24 pm
Fortunately for those women, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London, and not the Supreme Court, was Canada’s highest court at that time. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:04 pm
The Ministry of Justice has recently published its latest bulletin with statistics on privacy injunction hearings at the High Court and Court of Appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
City of New London (2005). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:24 am
As the authors note, in the recent JP Morgan “London Whale” settlement (about which refer here), the company kept its admissions vague on the issue of “who did what wrong” and avoided any mention of intent. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:30 am
http://t.co/SEv5uJuyyo -> Missing the Point on Piracy Data http://t.co/4EIdgxwrCf -> The London School of Economics Wets Itself http://t.co/cmtLdkCgbx -> Flogas Britain Ltd v Calor Gas Ltd [2013] EWHC 3060 http://t.co/VnuhkYXG3N important case on damages for breach of confidence -> Invideous Ltd & Ors v Thorogood & Ors [2013] EWHC 3015 http://t.co/2NSdeTBGyS interesting corporate opportunity case -> Link to the Throne Speech – full speed ahead on CETA and TPP … [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/nLeY5Rejqs -> Toronto City Council votes to ask the Federal Government extend the Temporary Worker Fee exemptions for musicians http://t.co/XnfKAVPbQG -> The Ontario Court of Appeal Addresses Jurisdiction Over International Tort Claim http://t.co/dPxuHHpU5t -> Russian government proposes site blocking as anti-piracy measure http://t.co/jfI9AmJlGO -> REPORT on the making available and communication to the public in the internet environment Adopted by ALAI… [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:27 am
Supreme Court’s decisions in Morrison, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the claims of putative class members who had purchased BP common shares on the London Stock Exchange (LSE). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:07 pm
A key point is the introduction of ‘Unlawful Profit Orders’, which get around the decision of the Court of Appeal in Sumal v Newham London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Crim 1840 that confiscation of rent was not possible because ‘the continued receipt of the rent was not the product of the appellants crime’. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:07 pm
A key point is the introduction of ‘Unlawful Profit Orders’, which get around the decision of the Court of Appeal in Sumal v Newham London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Crim 1840 that confiscation of rent was not possible because ‘the continued receipt of the rent was not the product of the appellants crime’. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
The High Court found that the consultation process in respect of the compensation decision was so unfair as to be unlawful, but dismissed the claims on all other grounds, as did the Court of Appeal. [read post]
