Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
She was given permanent accommodation before the Supreme Court hearing, but Lord Hope stated that, if there had been a live issue it would “have been preferable for her to be given an opportunity for the proportionality of the order to be considered in the light of her personal circumstances”. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
She was given permanent accommodation before the Supreme Court hearing, but Lord Hope stated that, if there had been a live issue it would “have been preferable for her to be given an opportunity for the proportionality of the order to be considered in the light of her personal circumstances”. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:55 pm
As the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, said in his speech: [I]n our country, which is governed by the rule of law, upheld by an independent judiciary, the confidentiality principle is … subject to the clear limitation that the government and the intelligence services can never provide the country which provides intelligence with an unconditional guarantee that the confidentiality principle will never be set aside if the courts conclude that the interests of justice make it… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
In the courts: WILLIAM WALTON+JOHN WEIR FRASER+MRS MAGGIE FRASER AGAINST A DECISION MADE BY THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS DATED 21 DECEMBER 2009 FROM THE DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORT v. , 11 August 2011, Lord Tyre: Road building a rerouting decisions in Scotland did not breach human rights of local residents. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:58 am
The contract expressly stated that the relationship between the parties was that of client and independent contractor. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am
By Tobias ThienelThe Pinochet line of cases in the English courts, and particularly in the UK House of Lords, will be reasonably familiar to most international lawyers. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:47 pm
In Furman v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:11 pm
The piece describes his hobbies and interests — including, but not limited to, Lord of the Rings — and talks about his father, who sounds like a somewhat odd character:Mark McDaniel, 58, on an Internet blog he started in January 2007, posted three times on and, inside of a week, abandoned, wrote:“Why am I interesting. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:58 am
It is not for a UK court to go further into that conclusion, said Lord Mance, which may yet be challenged in further United States litigation. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 7:06 am
Lord Woolman is the presiding judge in the present claim of M.Wilson v North Lanarkshire Council & Others (A1628/01). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:41 am
Jivraj v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:26 am
So it is with the arbitration contract, which the UK Supreme Court has discussed at length in its recent judgment in Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm
Lord knows the feds make chickenshit 1001 cases all the time. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 11:21 pm
Certainly—and as I acknowledge in the book—there are places and times in which international human rights law itself has wavered since 9/11 including in the A v United Kingdom decision of the ECtHR—but by and large it has demonstrated more resilience than one might have expected. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am
Lord Justice Hooper adopted Mr Justice Baker’s reasoning as to why this was a special case. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:10 am
Certainly—and as I acknowledge in the book—there are places and times in which international human rights law itself has wavered since 9/11 including in the A v United Kingdom decision of the ECtHR—but by and large it has demonstrated more resilience than one might have expected. [read post]
