Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 2821 - 2840 of 10,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 3:43 am by SHG
S., at 170 (opinion of ROBERTS, C. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Says Federal Courts Don’t Have a Role in Decidi [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm by Peter de la Cruz
There is no obvious precedent that will permit T-Mobile and Sprint to end the case quickly, but protracted litigation will test the resolve and resources of all the parties. [1] Robert H. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
He should rule a certain way in some cases, no matter what he thinks the law is, because to do otherwise will threaten the Court's legitimacy. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:16 am by Justin Sherman, Robert Morgus
Huawei’s ability to provide massive discounts, to use another example, won’t bother countries that don’t care about having their own international competitor to Huawei in the global 5G market. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I call attention to these features in order to engage a matter Lessig invites, namely, the question of whether his theory is falsifiable. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by SHG
Justice Robert Jackson famously told federal prosecutors that their job was to “do justice. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
Michael Dreeben, a longtime deputy solicitor general who specializes in criminal matters, is here today for the first time in quite a while. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
There are 3 opinions that concur in part and dissent in part, one by Roberts, one by Breyer, and one by Sotomayor. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
  However, when he decided to register the mark, the PTO rejected his application as directed toward immoral or scandalous matter as required by the Lanham Act. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eugene Volokh
" So we don't know for sure whether such a specific rule against registering vulgar and profane marks would be constitutional, though we know that it might be, and that this decision doesn't settle the matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As he puts it, “[t]he consequence of an election is that someone is elected. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
The Board’s Chairman, Justice Robert Blair, was scheduled to speak but was reportedly unable to get to Ottawa due to weather conditions in Toronto that morning. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
At the oral argument, Kavanaugh observed that “we can’t take the history out of the case. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:19 pm by Travis Weber
While Sections II-A and II-D of Alito’s opinion were only joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Kavanaugh, the refusal of Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas to join them was likely not due to disagreement with the outcome they would produce, but rather because they didn’t go far enough toward an originalist approach that would itself eliminate Lemon. [read post]