Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 2821 - 2840 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD 8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am by Jan von Hein
Kern, Judicial protection against torpedo actions In the recent case Weber v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Ginsburg is up next with Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
There was no logical basis for preferring significant figures approach [if you've ever wondered what is significant about significant figures, take a look at the quote in para 24: to the scientist there is a difference between 1.3 and 1.30 ...]. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm by MBettman
Although deportation may result in loss of all that makes life worth living (banishment from the United States and forced separation from one’s family), Ng Fung Ho v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
., Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Northwest Territories have all found these provisions as unconstitutional, culminating in the Supreme Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:37 am
This very question was subject to an application for judicial review brought by BASCA, the Musicians' Union, and UK Music against UK Government.After months of uncertainty, this morning Green J issued his judgment in BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]