Search for: "People v A. M." Results 2821 - 2840 of 14,343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Escott, R (On the application of) v Chichester District Council (2020) EWHC 1687 (Admin) A judicial review where the relevant parts played out in the early stages of the pandemic lockdown, and where the central question was whether self contained accommodation provided without a fridge, cooker and bed, was suitable within the meaning of section 206 Housing Act 1996, such that interim relief could be ordered. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:19 am by Eric Goldman
I’m sharing it now because so many people in DC are now prioritizing the destruction of Section 230 over addressing the many other devastating problems in our country.] [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am by Dennis Crouch
I think I’m going to slowly start phasing out all of my affairs. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:00 pm
I’m no fan of Black Lives Matter. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm
Mayfield is 44 years old, so with a 25-to-life sentence, he's likely to die in prison, especially as I suspect he's exceptionally unlikely to ever get paroled.)For myself, I'm loathe to call people undilutedly "evil" (a word that's in the opinion to describe Mr. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:47 pm by Ben Kostyack
“Whistleblowers can play a critical role in stopping police brutality,” said Stephen M. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am by Ashoka Mukpo
 McDonald tried to plead for instructions from the advancing officers, asking them what they wanted people to do. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am by Guest Blogger
The CERD has noted that in Canada, First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Peoples lack equal access to education, health care, social services, water, and access to justice. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Following the release of the Federal Court decision, Safe Food Matters announced on its website that it would review its next steps with counsel and its board, which could include a possible appeal, a further judicial review application, and pushing for changes to the law.Read the Federal Court decision at:  M. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Following the release of the Federal Court decision, Safe Food Matters announced on its website that it would review its next steps with counsel and its board, which could include a possible appeal, a further judicial review application, and pushing for changes to the law.Read the Federal Court decision at:  M. v. [read post]