Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 2821 - 2840
of 23,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm
(And another in Smith v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:02 am
How tough, however, has now been answered in the First Department's decision in People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:22 am
The day after the presidential election the justices will hear arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
In People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Brown v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:06 am
As Sam Kamin notes over at Co-Op, today the SCT is hearing arguments in Kennedy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:28 am
"I agree with the Court, of course, that background checks of employees of government contractors do not offend the Constitution," writes Justice Scalia in a concurring opinion in NASA v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 am
Whether or not the individual Justices viewed their actions this way at the time, many people saw Bush v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:01 am
Gosden v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Francis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 10:43 pm
In July 2018--shortly after Justice Kennedy announced his retirement--the WSJ published an editorial titled "The Abortion Scare Campaign: Why Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 9:00 pm
The United States has so many prisoners that the prison system -- and court, "criminal justice", prosecutor, and police systems that prosecute and sentence prisoners -- is so economically and socially entrenched that too many prisoners become mere numbers in too many people's eyes. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:07 pm
A few more details on R(Southwark Law Centre) v Legal Services Commission [2007] EWHC 1715 (Admin), which I mentioned a few days ago. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm
” Mr Justice LeBlanc, delivering judgment also considered the principles set out by the Canadian Supreme Court in Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 and R v Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442 (“the Dagenais/Mentuck test”), namely that a request for a publication ban may be ordered when: (a) such an order is necessary in order to prevent a serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonably… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:41 pm
In Magana v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 1:16 am
As the Fourth Department, held in People v Hall, 2008 NY Slip Op 10361 [12/21/08], if such relief is not sought at the lower court, the issue is not preserved for review:defendant contends that the presentence report should be amended because, according to defendant, it contains inaccurate assertions and unsupported speculation that "are likely to prejudice [defendant] for years to come" (see generally People v Harrington, 3 AD3d 737, 739). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:58 am
The first case, Riley v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Supreme Court Justice Ruth BaderGinsburg has stated it about as plainly as possible: "People who are wellrepresented at trial do not get the death penalty. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
United States and Pearson v. [read post]
