Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 11,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
However, there do seem to be a few of them around at this time of year -- and there also seem to be a lot of people, especially Europeans, who are determined to attend them. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm
In Scotland, members of the British House of Commons were not elected directly by the people (as they were in England). [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 2:09 pm
The dissent (to which only Judge Halligan signed on) offers a rare sociological attack on the criminal justice system.The case is People v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm
In Town of Greece v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 6:57 am
See Cathedral Hill Tower v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:45 pm
Citing Bailey v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
The council should have made enquiries and provided her with interim housing. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
The council should have made enquiries and provided her with interim housing. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:19 pm
Well, the Radmacher v Granatino case has certainly got family lawyers writing. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
Some people are cheering and some people are shrugging in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Star Athletica v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
The federal district court judge who has the case began his analysis of Meregildo’s motion by noting that the4th Amendment guarantees that all people shall be `secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 8:02 pm
In this year's Davis v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives to repeal the law, and a razor-thin loss for repeal advocates in the Supreme Court in 2012. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
News & World Report has an interview with Bill Burck, who served as White House deputy counsel under George W. [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:52 am
See, Huxford v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:05 pm
The case, Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
First up is Thacker v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Housing Authority (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 635 (Hanif),[1] Hamilton argued that because only the amounts paid by plaintiff and her insurer could be recovered, the larger amounts billed by the providers were irrelevant and should be excluded. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:19 am
When the Supremes held in Maryland v. [read post]
