Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 2,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2007, 1:06 am
The unanimous ruling in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:01 am
The ruling in KSR v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:00 am
A2979 Townsend (MS) -- Relates to the power of courts to deny orders of recognizance or bail where the defendant poses a risk of danger to the community
No Same as
BLURB : CP L. bail or recognizance; denia
First Act: 01/22/07 referred to codes
Last Act: 04/17/07 held for consideration in codes
A3657 Kirwan (MS) -- Requires lifetime post-release supervision for certain offenders; prohibits good behavior allowances against… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:20 am
Although there are limitations on a patent owner's ability to collect royalties beyond a patent's statutory term, see Brulotte v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:31 am
Although there are limitations on a patent owner's ability to collect royalties beyond a patent's statutory term, see Brulotte v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:14 pm
News Article: LINKEric Goldman's Blog Article: LINK1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 11:48 pm
Per Oravec v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
The Commission also identified from the record “several occasions in which JEDEC incorporated patented technologies into some standards after securing agreement from the patent holder that the technologies would be licensed on RAND, or specific-royalty, terms. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
USA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 4:14 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 10:50 am
In Hydril Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Strunk v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:41 am
It should help you to see that while the courts may be slow, they can get there.This order has to do with a woman who was not rich or powerful. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 3:20 am
From the opinion:The purpose of the quick-take power is for it to be used when the need for the public use is immediate. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
S'holders Litig., 2004 WL 1305745, *38 (Del. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 3:00 am
The case, California Farm Bureau Federation v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:13 am
These are meant to be equitable ways of limiting the power of a patent holder against those who should not be pursued for infringement. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:10 am
[The schedule may be found at the TTAB website (lower right-hand corner)].Ten TTAB hearings are scheduled for this month:January 10, 2007 - 2 PM: In re Tyco Plastics Services AG, Serial No. 78431431 [Section 2(d) refusal of PARTYPAL for a "disposable plastic plate containing a beverage holder" in view of the registered marks MERRY PALS, SPORTS PALS, and ZOO PALS for disposable dinnerware].January 11, 2007 - 10 AM: Champion Performance Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 5:12 pm
You may not have read the case entitled: Prince v. [read post]
