Search for: "STONE v. STONE" Results 2821 - 2840 of 3,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
It is, as both Marshall and Stone, suggested, otherwise a "tautology," telling us nothing whatsoever about the actual division of authority between national and state levels of government.Feeley and Rubin correctly point out that the Supreme Court's current doctrine regarding federalism is an incoherent muddle. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Douglas Berman considers Monday’s decision in Dean v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Peter S. Margulies
A similar dynamic has occurred following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:32 am by Steve Hall
That year, he famously wrote in dissent in Callins v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
Hood hearing, but they have great value, a sort of Rosetta Stone of Katrina litigation. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 3:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Catherine Arnold, INFORRM’S Blog: Case Law, Strasbourg: Zemmour v France, Journalist’s conviction for inciting discrimination did not breach Article 10. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
Here’s how we can observe it most vividly: If you take every week of 2020 so far and compare them to the same week in 2019 (week 1 2020 v. week 1 2019, week 2 2020 v. week 2 2019), you can see the most significant week-for-week drop in relative traffic happened on the week of March 16, 2020: That 0.47% drop is more than two times the standard deviation for the population (0.18%). [read post]