Search for: "Seales v. State" Results 2821 - 2840 of 3,449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 1:12 pm by Erik Gerding
Assume that tomorrow someone from ACA publicly stated “Whoops! [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:19 pm by Kim Zetter
Under California law, the public has a right to see the documents that led San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:47 pm by Dwight Sullivan
There will probably never be a record of trial in the court-martial case of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:47 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the court-martial trial level:   Tomorrow an Article 39(a) session is scheduled at Norfolk in the third and final SEAL case, United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Clair Nation, an engineer licensed by the New York State Department of Education, was alleged to have placed his seal on digitally altered photographs submitted to the New York City Department of Buildings [DOB] in connection with a pavement plan for a building under construction in Brooklyn. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am by admin
Charlie Crist’s controversial Big Sugar land buy – or serve as a judicial kick in the butt to finally seal the much-delayed, twice-downsized deal. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm by Rick
  Entering a home, entering a car, or opening a sealed package is normally considered a search that the Fourth Amendment regulates with either a warrant requirement or probable cause. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
United States Marines only ever voice this sentiment with power and precision. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:24 pm by Dwight Sullivan
My understanding is that the first of the SEALs cases to be tried will be United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm by Michael C. Smith
John Ward in a Marshall case that alleges that what is waitin' at the station in Tenaha was not exactly a gal ...In Morrow, et al. v. [read post]