Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 2821 - 2840 of 3,989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Now, only the United States may sue for statutory damages.A new private suit provision (35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:21 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on October 13, 2011 released the following: "SAN JUAN, PR-On October 7, 2011, a federal grand jury indicted 82 individuals as a result of an investigation led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD), announced today United States Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:21 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on October 13, 2011 released the following: "SAN JUAN, PR-On October 7, 2011, a federal grand jury indicted 82 individuals as a result of an investigation led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD), announced today United States Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:06 am by Ken Lammers
This is probably best expressed in People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
In today’s world, physical presence was not a meaningful surrogate for the economic presence sufficient to make a seller the subject of state taxation. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Jeffrey Krivis
Superior Court, 62 Cal App. 4th 155, (1998); Olam v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]