Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2019, 10:00 am
Stanford University licensed four patents to ThermoLife. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
Cooter and Siegel did not even try to account for these cases in their Stanford Law Review piece. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WTO panel releases decision in US complaint against China over its IP laws (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (ContentAgenda) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Michael Geist) (Law360) (Techdirt) (Patent Docs) WIPO press release: ‘Global economic slowdown impacts 2008 international patent filings’… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:26 am
Garrett, professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, the findings of which are published in an article by Professor Garrett in a recent issue of the Stanford Law Review, show how and why innocent people confess to crimes they did not commit. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:42 am
This second part reviews the remaining judgments which concern Exhumation and Churchyards and burials. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 2:56 pm
Finally, the Stanford Law Review has posted the final version of Rick Hasen’s (Loyola Law School-Los Angeles) article entitled “The Untimely Death of Bush v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 10:36 am
What about comparisons to law reviews or other types of secondary sources? [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 1:02 pm
Berry Law helps Veterans fight for the benefits they deserve. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:24 am
edit / delete to nanotechnology+law nanotechnology+regulation ... on dec 07 Legal Lookout: Nanotechnology : EPA Considers How to Proceed edit / delete to epa nanotechnology+law nanotechnology+regulation environmental+law ... on dec 07 EUROPA - Rapid - Press Releases edit / delete to nanotechnology+law nanotechnology+regulation risk eu+law ... on dec 04 REACH is not enough, new labelling method might be required edit / delete to… [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 8:27 am
I'm delighted to be able to pass along this item from my Stanford colleague Prof. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 12:39 pm
To preserve blind review, we ask that you not ask members of the program committee to review draft abstracts in advance of submission. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:50 am
If this is the intention of the California reform bill drafters, then the California DWC can take a queue from the Texas DWC and plagiarize a good amount of their regulations, and hopefully avoid dreaded UC.Many thanks to Texas attorney Stuart Colburn with the Downs Stanford, P.C. law firm, who prepared a rules update from which much of my information on MBDR and MNDR is taken. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 9:00 am
Chiodini, Nonprofit Law Matters, Jan. 25, 2012) How Foundations Are Using Impact Investing to Advance Racial Equity (Stanford Social Innovation Review) The Case for Selective Discrimination (A. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:43 pm
So: Co-Conspirator Todd notes the Stanford Law School conference on the Constitution and the Financial Crisis, at which both he and I spoke a couple of weeks ago. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Zambrano is an Associate Professor of Law at Stanford Law School (Dzambran@law.stanford.edu). [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
” https://bit.ly/3GVmLAC @causeinfluence @derrickfeldmann Stanford Social Innovation Review: Complimentary registration is open! [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:03 pm
Elston replied later that day: "I have reviewed her application materials, Carol. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
Not just the intellectual content but the readable prose bear the stamp of Stanford Law School, from which the author has derived help, encouragement and not a little inspiration. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 2:14 pm
Cir. 2007) ("confidentiality" rule that could be viewed as banning discussion of working conditions violates §8(a)(1)); Stanford Hosp. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 7:12 am
In his June 2020 Stanford Law Review Online article, entitled "Why Do Rule 48(a) Dismissals Require 'Leave of Court'? [read post]
