Search for: "State of Connecticut" Results 2821 - 2840 of 17,595
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Along with the Lanham Act allegations, Lemberg alleged that Section 7.2 of the Connecticut Rules of Professional Conduct mandates that any advertisement for legal services “shall include the name of at least one lawyer admitted in Connecticut responsible for [the ad’s] contents” and that “soliciting cases for third party attorneys” was illegal under state law and thus “unfair. [read post]
” On May 18, 2020, two days before anticipated reopening, Governor Lamont issued Executive Order No. 7 PP regarding Phase 1 of Connecticut’s Reopening. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm by tvasil
All Lines of Insurance The mandatory grace periods or premium deferral and/or moratoria on termination for non-payment expired today in the following states: Alaska (June 1) Connecticut (June 1) Property and Casualty Insurance Oklahoma:  On May 29, Governor Stitt issued Executive Order 2020-20 extending the state of emergency from June 11 to June 29. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
Connecticut — $153,640 But pay differs not only between states but between cities as well. [read post]
In the United States, sick pay is not required by the federal government (a few US states mandate sick pay: the District of Columbia, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington). [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
Defendant maintains Executive Order 34 only suggests "residents of States of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut should refrain from travel to Maine" (emphasis added), and that this suggestion is not criminally enforceable. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:08 am by Tom Kosakowski
 Related posts: American Bar Association Passes Resolution in Support of Ombuds; Tool-Kit Offers Resources for Ombuds Day; ABA to Host Ombuds Day Reception in Washington, DC; State of Colorado to Observe Ombuds Day 2018; State of Connecticut Declares Ombuds Day 2018; Today is the First Ombuds Day! [read post]
29 May 2020, 8:50 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
After the state supreme court issued a pair of Batson-challenge cases, court watchers there would not be surprised if the Tar Heel State joined Washington State, California, and Connecticut in setting up a commission to examine whether racial discrimination in jury selection is prevalent and, if so, how to address it effectively. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The state actions came after it spent tens of millions of dollars in lobbying and other advocacy per year. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:00 pm
            Risk of injury to a minor, a felony in Connecticut requires proof that a person exposed a minor to risk of harm. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ends Inquiries Into 3 Senators’ Stock Trades” by Katie Benner and Nicholas Fandos for New York Times Colorado: “Hickenlooper Says He Won’t Appear Before Colorado Ethics Body for Video Trial in June” by Alex Burness for Denver Post Connecticut: “Dalios Pull Out of State Education Partnership, Attack GOP Reps” by Kaitlyn Krasselt for Connecticut Post Legislative Issues National: “Republicans Sue Pelosi to Block House Proxy… [read post]
27 May 2020, 5:00 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti and Maya Atrakchi
In the midst of COVID-19 challenges, privacy and security matters continue to be at the forefront for federal and state legislature. [read post]
26 May 2020, 5:00 pm
            There are approximately 21,000 lawyers licensed to practice law in Connecticut, making the state the sixth-most lawyer-rich population in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Had the understanding in the period surrounding the ratification of the Bill of Rights been that the various forms of accommodation discussed by the dissent were constitutionally required (either by State Constitutions or by the Federal Constitution), it would be surprising not to find a single state or federal case refusing to enforce a generally applicable statute because of its failure to make accommodation. [read post]