Search for: "State of New York v Robert V." Results 2821 - 2840 of 4,743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm by LindaMBeale
  The limitation of lawful marriage to heterosexual couples, which for centuries had been deemed both necessary and fundamental, came to be seen in New York and certain other States as an unjust exclusion. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm by Helen Alvare
   It used these statements in order to describe what New York was doing when it decided to confer the designation of “marriage” upon two persons of the same-sex. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm by Randy Barnett
  In this way, the federalism concerns expressed on pages 17-19 are as essential to its due process/equal protection reasoning as they were to Justice Roberts’ adoption of a “saving construction” in NFIB v Sebelius. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Richard Hasen
Saying so directly would have made today’s controversial decision even more provocative than it is; obfuscation better serves the Chief Justice’s attempt to portray his decision as an act of judicial modesty rather than a radical restricting on Congress’s power against the states (more on that in my op-ed for The New York Times). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Dan Stein
  Further coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Pete Williams and Erin McClam of NBC News, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Richard Wolf and Brad Heath of USA Today, Bill Mears of CNN, Fox News, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Stephanie Condon of CBS News, Martin J. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm by Michael Fox
  An example is By 5-4, a More Hostile Workplace by New York Times editorial board member Teresa Tritch.My comments on the two decisions, Vance v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Beth Graham
In 2003, the class action cases were consolidated in the Southern District of New York and ordered to bilateral arbitration. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:45 pm by Aaron Barkoff
RELATED READING: Actavis press release FTC statement GPhA statement New York Times PhRMA statement SCOTUSblog [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm by Simon Chester
It's the end of an era And he made new law on the extent to which litigants can badger a non-party in depositions: see 197 F.3d 922 (1999) MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET MATTER # 1, Appellees, v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:27 am by Howard Wasserman
In my recent article on the jurisdictional issues in New York Times v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The New York Times story about PRISM has been updated, and here’s the latest The Hill story by Carlo Munoz about the goings-on. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The suit was brought by a New York woman who was denied a marital tax from the federal estate tax when her spouse denied, even though the validity of their marriage was recognized by New York, the state where the couple resided. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
” Other coverage of the case comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal (registration required), Josh Gerstein and Darren Samuelsohn of Politico, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Dominic Perella at MSNBC, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:54 am by Amanda Frost
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (public sector union fees); and United States v. [read post]