Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 2821 - 2840 of 15,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 4:02 pm by Cory Doctorow
The rules for initiating investigations are set out in Chapter IV and the enforcement rules are in Chapter V. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:27 am by David Post
********* Now that the dust is starting to settle from the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:19 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
That said, as the Paris High Court stated, ASIs are justified in the presence of a contractual forum clause. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
   On 11 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in Mastercard v Merricks, dismissing Mastercard’s appeal. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 6:58 am by skelly
On December 10th, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its ruling in Rutledge v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The second is Robinson (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
" … CDT's failure to satisfy Article III's standing requirement is enough to dismiss its complaint under Rule 12(b)(1). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Second, as stated, the rule that there’s no © in works “(1) created by judges and legislators (2) in the course of their judicial and legislative duties,” leaves open what happens if the works are created by lobbyists and then incorporated into law, or if they’re made part of the law like building codes drafted by private parties. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:53 pm by Milena Sterio
  In this Report, the Prosecutor concluded that  on the basis of the information available, there is a reasonable basis to believe that, at a minimum, the following war crimes have been committed by members of UK armed forces: wilful killing/murder under article 8(2)(a)(i)) or article 8(2)(c)(i)); torture and inhuman/cruel treatment under article 8(2)(a)(ii) or article 8(2)(c)(i)); outrages upon personal dignity under article 8(2)(b)(xxi) or article… [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am by Neil Wilkof
Rejecting the Defences raised by the accused, the District Court found the accused guilty of an offence under section 49(c). [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:08 pm by Natalma M. McKnew
Several state Attorneys General challenged the new regulation in New York et al v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
” 3) Copyright vs data protection: CJEU grappling with the right to information about infringers by Giulia Priora “On 9 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-264/19 Constantin Film Verleih v YouTube and Google Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
” 3) Copyright vs data protection: CJEU grappling with the right to information about infringers by Giulia Priora “On 9 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-264/19 Constantin Film Verleih v YouTube and Google Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm by Robert Chesney
Under Section 1752(c)(1)(B), the NCD’s role is limited to the ability to “offer advice and consultation” to, well, everyone in the federal government with equities relating to cybersecurity. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]