Search for: "State v. Country" Results 2821 - 2840 of 26,679
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2019, 9:17 am by Jim Singer
U.S. patent law states that any invention that was “on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent” is not eligible for patent protection. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 1:58 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  In Delgado v Osuna, --- F.3d ----, 2016 WL 5076017  (5th Cir., 2016) the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district courts denial of  Dr. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm by Unknown
Harrington (Prisoner Civil Rights)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlHwal'Bay Ba J Enterpises v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:59 am
Cogliati-Bantz, The M/V “Virginia G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau) Shen Wei, FG Hemisphere Associates v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 2:19 pm by Unknown
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Cultural Resources)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlDuke S. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 6:29 pm by Howard Friedman
 The Supreme Court gives RLUIPA a broad interpretation in Holt v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
On July 18, 2007, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the United States Government's interpretation of the Treaty of Amity between the United States and Iran, and affirmed an earlier decision allowing American plaintiffs to sue Iran in U.S. courts under Article IV(2) of the Treaty: McKesson Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Rosalind English
The Appeal  The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in  Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
Lord Lloyd-Jones concurred with Lord Neuberger’s observation in ZA (Nigeria) that rule 353 has an independent effect which is that no right of appeal ever arises, rather than only to limit to an out-of-country appeal, and the rule operates at a prior stage to s 94. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:30 am by Liisa Speaker
The case of Ray v Swager, No: 322766, came to the Michigan Court of Appeals (MCOA) on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:41 pm by Orin Kerr
This issue is being litigated all over the country right now thanks to a clash of two recent Fourth Amendment cases, Herring v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]