Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2821 - 2840 of 4,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm by Susan Brenner
Barr, __ S.E.2d __, 2012 WL 387867 (North Carolina Court of Appeals 2012). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:38 pm by Sam Murrant
In the courts The Mayor Commonalty and Citizens of London v Samede (St Paul’s Churchyard camp representative) & Ors (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA Civ 160 Court of Appeal refuses permission for Occupy London to appeal High Court eviction ruling. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by The Complex Litigator
Bank National Association (February 6, 2012), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division One) reversed that verdict, decertified the class, and sent the whole thing back down to the trial court for further consideration of how to resolve the individual break claims in light of Brinker. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:52 am by Daniel Richardson
 The trial court explained that under the SCOV’s decisions in State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:35 pm by The Complex Litigator
(January 25, 2012), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) dispensed wisdom, a drop at a time, about the viability of claims related to hot gas. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:48 pm by James Eckert
The Appellate Division reversed, saying "identity my ass" (I haven't read the decision). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Wanda
According to the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Jordan’s “criminal conduct” resulted in “multiple violations” of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Wanda
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am by Lara
 Even disputes that never make it to court — like those involving “private” correspondence or complaints to state agencies — are tried in the court of public opinion. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Justice Emerson declined to follow Bouhayer, stating that it has not been followed by other courts and that it is contrary to the demand-futility test established in Marx v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
WIAL's Notice of Arbitration mentions the court's advice of its inclination to dismiss the petition as the reason for its withdrawal.10.03.2003: Application by WIAL (GA 934/2003) before the Calcutta High Court to dismiss AP No. 290/2002.27.11.2003: GA 934/2003 was rejected by a Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court (judgement)15.12.2003: Appeal filed APOT 719/2003 from the decision of the Single Judge in GA 934/200307.05.2004: Appeal APOT… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The patent was revoked by the Opposition Division (OD) in its decision dated December 28, 2007. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm by Richard Frank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from last December’s federal district court decision in Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court observed that because "plaintiff's contention that the action was stayed pursuant to CPLR 321 (c) [was] raised for the first time on appeal," it "[was] not properly before [the Appellate Division]. [read post]