Search for: "State v. English"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
" So begins, Carr J's latest trade mark judgment in the English High Court - Pathway IP SARL v Easygroup Ltd [2018] EWHC 3608.This case was a High Court appeal from a successful application by EasyGroup to revoke two trade marks for non-use. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:21 am
But as his recent opinions in Alleyne v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
In the recent case Hatkoff v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Grzelak v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
In Mercredi v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 1:08 pm
Law as employees based in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:43 am
See Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
Case citation: Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Back in June, I wrote about Kernel Records Oy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:17 am
Last week, the Supreme Court heard Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 4:29 pm
In my recent post on the Malkiewicz v UK application, I noted two ideas for reducing exorbitant cost of defamation proceedings. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:27 pm
On Monday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
In Nicastro, the defendant was an English manufacturer of metal shearing machines, which were made in England. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Corp. v New York State Dept. of Labor, 80 AD3d 924 and other court rulings, the Appellate Division observed that it is well settled that "a petitioner is not aggrieved by an administrative determination made on its default and may not seek to review such a determination. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:32 am
This would be because this piece of EU legislation does not allow Member States to allocate a portion of the fair compensation to the publishers if there is no obligation for the publishers to ensure that they pass on this part, directly or indirectly, to the authors.In its analysis the ECS endorsed the AG Opinion on this point, and submitted that the CJEU should (re-)affirm the author principle, ie initial ownership of copyright for authors. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:15 am
(a Taiwan Corp.) and HTC America (its US subsidiary based in Washington State) are accused of infringement. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 5:58 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
