Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 27,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2014, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am
When the Supreme Court re-calibrated the fair use analysis to focus on transformativeness in Campbell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:11 pm
Second, the court based the decision, at least in part, on the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Encino Motor Cars, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly in Pollen v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation" - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat)… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm
IntroductionThe recent decision in Baker v. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court It is incumbent on the state to establish any wrongdoing. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:28 am
") AC30082 - State v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 8:37 am
In 1995, in Celotex v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:35 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Harrington v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 12:48 pm
This procedure is addressed in Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
United States, No. 18-1851 C (Ct. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:09 am
But in order to have accurate and fair elections, it is important to have accurate and fair discussions about elections. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
Here is the opinion in Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
