Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 13,235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am
First up is Guerrero-Lasprilla v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:05 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Georgia v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 1:05 am
The case of Huggins v Scott, decided last month by Justice W. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:03 pm
Thus, the famous case of Perry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
They raise the price, eliminate competition, cut people out, transfer consumer surplus to themselves—but they are also giving something to people who canafford the chair: a chair with more narrative and thus more market value. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:56 am
People v Vera & Magda Realty Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 32650(U) (N.Y. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
On top of the dangers to consumers, the legal market would also suffer, as untaxed and unregulated products would have significant competitive advantages over high-priced legal products. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
The second is that sexual orientation discrimination is unlawful sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
The price of inaction to protect the voting rights of Americans is high, and history offers a myriad of examples demonstrating its cost to the nation. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:07 am
Rubin at Bloomberg Law reports that the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Georgia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:40 pm
” Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
Thus, for example, price discounts aimed at recreating the right balance among spectrum fees are not considered State aid. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows: (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred eighty-four thousand dollars of the payor's annual income; provided, however, beginning March first, two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes in the consumer … [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Bandera Master Fund LP v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am
Even Qualcomm itself doesn't charge two prices for products other than its modem chips. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 2:25 pm
Slightly more worrying though is that the Upper Tribunal does not appear to have had much of the fairly extensive case law on inherent or structural defect v repair cited to it. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
