Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 40,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2023, 11:37 am
See: Yost v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:48 am
This latter holding may therefore be undone by California state courts, and this precise issue is before the California Supreme Court in Adolph v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:20 am
On Monday, in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:09 am
” ECF No. 83-1 at 4.Davi v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
In other words, there has always been a higher standard of proof for the defendant’s mental state. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:08 am
In other words, there has always been a higher standard of proof for the defendant’s mental state. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Take another example: the Clean Power Plan overturned by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:40 pm
One of their many cases, Baker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:11 pm
From today's Michigan Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 11:53 am
The article states that, according to news accounts (apparently based on Sokolov's own comments), Sokolov was questioned about his job, his military service, and his views of the "special military operation" in Ukraine. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 8:04 am
Mich.) in Al Qassimi Academy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:41 pm
Components Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
With this Kat’s feed being flooded with the news of the ruling in “Pecorino Romano” v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
In other words, 501(c)(7) organizations are not qualified for donor tax deduction because it is not described in §170(c).[11] “The tax code treats social clubs least favorably of all mutual benefit organizations”[12] because it serves only the members of the organization for a narrow recreational or interest purpose. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:59 am
Not to bore you, but this analysis has to do with interpreting the words "remedies" and "relief" under the IDEA. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 2:56 pm
” Nkanginieme v. [read post]
