Search for: "Supreme Court of Florida" Results 2821 - 2840 of 18,476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2021, 3:30 pm by Kathryn Rubino
Sure, We Need Supreme Court Reform: Doesn't mean we'll get it. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:04 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Late last year, the Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion amending Rule 1.510, Florida’s summary judgment standard. [read post]
20 May 2021, 8:29 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Florida Supreme Court approved an ethics opinion that an attorney's federal practice conducted out of his Florida home did not run afoul of unauthorized practice restrictions Thomas Restaino, an out-of-state licensed attorney, filed with the Standing Committee a request... [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:30 am by Ryan J. Farrick
The lawsuit was filed by a tenured Florida law professor who said FAMU lied in court about pay disparities between male and female faculty. [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:00 am by Paul Caron
Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a law professor's challenge of a win for Florida A&M University in... [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:36 am by Buckingham
He helps clients with complicated tax challenges including Ohio sales/use, income, commercial activity and federal taxes and has represented clients before the Ohio Supreme Court. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division noted that pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 70, “[w]here a minor child is residing within this state, either parent may apply to the supreme court for a writ of habeas corpus to have such minor child brought before such court; and on the return thereof, the court, on due consideration, may award ... custody of such child to either parent. [read post]
16 May 2021, 9:10 pm by Series of Essays
July 7, 2020 | Explaining the Supreme Court’s DACA Decision | A recent Supreme Court decision maintains protection for people who arrived to the United States as children. [read post]
15 May 2021, 2:54 pm by David J. Halberg, Esq.
That’s because the dangerous instrumentality doctrine, or DID, recognized by the Florida Supreme Court in 1920, imposes strict vicarious liability on vehicle owners. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:30 am by Jordan Rothman
* Judge Judy claims that expanding the Supreme Court is a "dumb idea. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The deal appears likely to avert a definitive court precedent that would draw a clear line in ambiguous areas: the scope and limits of Congress’s constitutional power to compel testimony for its oversight responsibilities, and a president’s constitutional power to keep secret conversations with a White House lawyer. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:24 pm by Howard Bashman
Florida AG slams Biden for holding first Supreme Court commission meeting virtually; The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States will hold a ‘public virtual meeting’ on May 19”: Thomas Barrabi of Fox News has this report. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:23 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Florida Supreme Court has reprimanded a judge According to the stipulation, Judge Cupp admits that the conduct described in the Notice of Formal Charges occurred. [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
He continues to fail (or refuse) to understand that the Court’s unanimous ruling does not mean that it did not consider the merits. [read post]
11 May 2021, 12:02 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
It requires forming and registering a committee, getting approval of the initiative language from the Attorney General and Florida Supreme Court, and securing thousands of signatures. [read post]
11 May 2021, 10:26 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Past Chair of the Elder Law Section of the Florida Bar, Florida Bar Board Certified in Elder Law, Florida Supreme Court Certified Civil MediatorI recently reported on the Erlandsson v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 6:53 am by Arielle E. Katz
Even if the footnote were dicta, the court found that it “signal[ed] the intent of the Supreme Court and what it would hold in future cases and, as such, may not be cavalierly dismissed by a district court. [read post]
11 May 2021, 6:53 am by Arielle E. Katz
Even if the footnote were dicta, the court found that it “signal[ed] the intent of the Supreme Court and what it would hold in future cases and, as such, may not be cavalierly dismissed by a district court. [read post]