Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2014, 6:22 am
By 2003, the number increased to "up to 20 million men." [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Geography isn’t as foundational to the TM system; more politically up for grabs.Dinwoodie: that’s a common law way of thinking: registration lets you get whole classes. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
I’m afraid I won’t live up to it, because I just have a series of questions. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
Cohen v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
This association certainly takes advantage of the claimants' investment in Betty Boop because many consumers will be moved to buy the t-shirt as a result of the favourable associations conjured up in their mind by Betty Boop, which assoc [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:56 am
Stout v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 10:55 pm
In Covidien LP v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 5:24 am
Jordan v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
” Trademark protection in the absence of consumer confusion at the point of sale is justified, at least in part, as a means of preserving the status of consumers of “true” luxury products, even if no one ever makes a mistaken purchase. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
And we have a money back guarantee to . . . back that statement up. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
So consumer protection advocates confront the argument that the SCt has rejected general balancing tests. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Uncertainties as to the bound of ACPA (Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) This case is not over. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Uncertainties as to the bound of ACPA (Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) This case is not over. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm
Uncertainties as to the bound of ACPA (Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) This case is not over. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
`[T]he standards for false designation of origin claims under . . . (15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:12 pm
The Board is to adopt an average return of at least the Consumer Price Index (CPI) + 4.5 to + 5.5 per cent per annum over the long term as the benchmark return on the Fund. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Logically, next up is "How is that legal?" [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
AT&T Operator Sued Under OSHA Filed in the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm
Gov’t pressure makes it particularly nefarious, though it would be concerning anyway.Sapna Kumar: gov’t surveillance and ISPs—the rise of ISPs that post statements that they haven’t been compromised, or noisily closing up shop. [read post]
