Search for: "U. S. v. Grant"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 3,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Jacaranda Holdings, LLC, 2012 NY Slip Op 50724(U) (Sup Ct NY County Apr. 20, 2012). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
Lupin also relied on the Federal Circuit’s 2004 decision in Arnold Partnership v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
The Solicitor General recommends the Court grant only on the second question. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 7:54 am
” Lutkauskas v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am
That’s because the court isn’t having another conference to discuss potential grants until October 28, and with no conference looming, the clerk’s office is slower in updating the dockets. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:28 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of Janisch’s argument by noting, first, that she “[u]ndoubtedly, obtained data. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Keisel next argues that the district court erred in granting the Jazz's motion for summary judgment on the defamation claim that Keisel filed against the team. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:20 am
For the above stated reasons, Hurwitz’s motion to dismiss Miami Capital’s complaint is granted. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
Ramsey, 431 U. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:21 am
McCarthy, Trademarks & Unfair Competition §18:48, p. 18–112 (4th ed. 2012) (“[U]ncontrolled and ‘naked’ licensing can result in such a loss of significance of a trademark that a federal registration should be cancelled”); Sun Banks of Fla., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
The prosecution appealed the trial judge’s order granting the motion to suppress, and on January 24, 2008 the Michigan Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s order. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:28 pm
State of Illinois v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:51 pm
Grant. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
We also consider the extent to which popular sovereignty can be constrained under the U,S, constitutional system.II. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm
U. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
”); Michael S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:13 am
After the arbitrator granted Sandner and Rubinstein’s motion to withdraw, Plaintiff proceeded pro se. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:08 am
The court’s opinion in Poole v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:03 am
Here’s the question on which the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v Tempnology, LLC case: Whether, under §365 of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor-licensor’s “rejection” of a license agreement—which “constitutes a breach of such contract,” 11 U.S.C. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:03 am
Here’s the question on which the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v Tempnology, LLC case: Whether, under §365 of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor-licensor’s “rejection” of a license agreement—which “constitutes a breach of such contract,” 11 U.S.C. [read post]
