Search for: "USA v. GRANT" Results 2821 - 2840 of 3,249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAntitrust Eye Surgery Equipment Maker's Tying Claim Survives; Predatory Pricing Claim Dismissed Synergetics USA Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 9:17 am by Brian Evans
  At the same time, finality in death penalty cases is often granted undue emphasis at the expense of a careful examination of the potential evidence related to innocence claims. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:02 pm
” “I represented the defendant Lozza SpA in this trademark infringement abandonment, unfair competition, breach of contract, and rescission action [Fratelli Lozza (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 6:20 pm
Borden Larson appealed the decisions of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida that granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Correct Craft, Inc. [read post]
Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court.ANOTHER NO-DUTY ABSOLUTION (FOR EMPLOYER WHO REQUIRED 12 HOUR SHIFTS - FATIGUED WORKER CAUSE WRECK AFTER GETTING OFF WORK)Nabors Drilling, USA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:54 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certiorari overnight. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:58 am
(A Global Day of Action in support of Davis has been organized by Amnesty International USA for May 19th. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
  Both the USA (with which C v D was concerned) and India are parties to the New York Convention, but the basis of the Convention, as explained in C v D, as applied in England in accordance with its own principles on the conflict of laws, is that the courts of the seat of arbitration are the only courts where the award can be challenged whilst, of course, under Article V of the Convention there are limited grounds upon which other contracting states… [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:11 pm
Outside the Box Innovations, LLC (d/b/a Union Rich USA) v. [read post]