Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm
A few years too many for Oracle, which wants this resolved, but not for Google, which never went out of its way to accelerate anything here.On Monday afternoon local time, Judge William Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who once compared this case to the "World Series of IP cases", did the equivalent of a soccer referee blowing the whistle when the second half starts. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
United States, 2016 WL 6661146 (D. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 11:23 am
A person is lawfully upon the private property of such owner within the meaning of this section when he is on such property in the performance of any duty imposed upon him by the laws of this state or by the laws or postal regulations of the United States, or when he is on such property upon the invitation, express or implied, of the owner.Even with this rule, there are some critical facts you need to learn about your specific injury case. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:26 pm
The defendants invite us to assert the "judicial Power of the United States" over a matter that belongs to the states. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:05 am
Qualcomm this year) may even find it highly dissuasive.Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over the Epic Games v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:03 am
Given the amount of time and energy devoted to this fight by The Regents of the University of California, an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit seems likely. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
The court took note of the pending United States Supreme Court review in Ex Parte Medellin (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) 223 S.W.3d 315, cert. granted Apr. 30, 2007, sub nom. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 am
In Bernal v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:26 am
ShareIn Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:58 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted that motion, holding that plaintiffs had not alleged falsity or materiality. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:05 am
Executive Office United States Marshals, 2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of California offered a well-reasoned reality check in Carpenter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:27 am
See Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:55 am
California's anti-SLAPP statute provides that a special motion to strike may be filed against "[a] cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue . . . [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:04 pm
As soon as I glanced at United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm
On January 2, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (“Tenth Circuit”) denied the State of Oklahoma’s motion for a stay pending appeal to the United States Supreme Court and one week later transferred jurisdiction back to the district court[1] regarding Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:25 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 1:30 pm
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm
On August 3, 2011, Litepanels, Inc. of Van Nuys, California and Litepanels, Ltd. of the United Kingdom (collectively, “Litepanels”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
