Search for: "United States v. Mannings"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 6,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
Prior to around the 1970s, no state law defined marriage as between a man and a woman. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm
Qualified Immunity In 1989, the United States Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:05 pm
The case is Dos Santos v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:35 am
" Again, the court found that only a rational basis is required and that one exists here.In a dissent, Justice Burke wrote that the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am
” In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus similarly decries the ruling, contending that, although the United States is “a predominantly Christian nation,” “we live here, too — we are Americans, too — and the Constitution, which prohibits elevating one religion over another, demands some sensitivity to this fact. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:56 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Sachs, Bill Sjostrom, Marc Steinberg, Ahmed Taha, Steven Thel, Randall Thomas, and Manning Warren.) [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:03 am
” In that case, the court discerned a grant of jurisdiction in a charter that authorized the Red Cross to “sue and be sued in courts of law and equity, State or Federal, within the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
And if a judge’s personal characteristics were relevant, why shouldn’t the six current United States Supreme Court justices who are Catholics be excluded from ruling on a case about the religious freedom of Catholics? [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:28 am
First, in McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 [1985]; United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:00 am
Criminal Defense Lawyers Can Fight Back Now – Thanks to the United States Supreme Court Meanwhile, the United States Supreme Court is getting involved. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared each of Alice’s patents invalid for not defining patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
16 May 2010, 8:46 am
United States (1998) 45 F.Supp.2d 787. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:42 am
RFA Brands, LLC v. [read post]
