Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2821 - 2840 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
While many of these provisions are consistent with the laws of Bangladesh, several key provisions are drawn from either the law of the United States or norms included in a number of international treaties (only some of which have been ratified or incorporated into the laws of either the United and or Bangladesh). [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:01 am by DONALD SCARINCI
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), the Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:23 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
.), University of California Press, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4262774 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4262774 – “Reproductive rights in the United States are under threat, and the threat is growing more serious by the day. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm by Guest Blogger
The exchange has filed for bankruptcy protection in Japan and, subsequent to the institution of class action proceedings, in the United States as well. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:02 am
Velosolex America owns a U.S. trade mark "VS VELOSOLEX" since 2002 and distributes the "Black n Roll" Solex in the United States under the trade mark "Velosolex". [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
For example, in 2020 the PTO denied registration to the mark TRUMP TOO SMALL in connection with T-shirts, even though the applicant argued that the mark was “political commentary about presidential candidate and president Donald Trump that the relevant consumer in the United States would not understand to be sponsored by, endorsed by, or affiliated with Donald Trump. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:31 pm by Anthony Gaughan
I’m teaching insurance law this semester and yesterday the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in a very interesting insurance case out of Minnesota, Sveen v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:40 am by Susan Brenner
According to markings on these documents, the e-mails were printed on August 8, 2009, in the United States. 85. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
  The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 2:00 pm by Doug Cornelius
United States Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.), and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Ranking Member of the Senate Banking Committee, along with Representatives Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.), and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) unveiled the Stop Wall Street Looting Act last week. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm by Colin Murray
If that was the political calculation, then the circumstances surrounding it became much more complicated with the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Greens v United Kingdom at the end of last month. [read post]