Search for: "United States v. Marks" Results 2821 - 2840 of 9,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Says lawprof Neal Kumar Katyal, who is representing the state of Louisiana as it seeks to reopen the Supreme Court case Kennedy v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
It considers how the test is applied by national trade mark registries across EU member states, by the EUIPO, by national courts, and by the CJEU. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:35 am
When state sponsored prayer is a perfunctory and sterile exercise marking the beginning of a commission agenda, religion becomes the casualty.Americans United issued a press release criticizing the decision. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  The one spectacular failure, marked by the American Civil War (1861-65), produced a somewhat radical restructuring of the state apparatus, the full measure of the potential of which was not realized until the economic and racial crises of the United States (1929-1969). [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am by Andree Blumstein
Mark Janus is a child-support specialist employed by Illinois. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:30 am by Paul Jacobson
With a user base larger than the United States if it were a country, Facebook is in a unique position to shape much of the social Web, even if that includes shuttering smaller, niche competitors along the way. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:31 pm by Lowell Brown
Momentum is strong in the wake of the court’s June 2013 decisions in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a first-hand look at yesterday’s argument in Flowers v. [read post]