Search for: "United States v. Richards" Results 2821 - 2840 of 3,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am by Juan C. Antúnez
 As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:14 pm by Kurt R. Karst
” The issue of whether this “second violation” felony requires evidence of intent was addressed in a recent Ninth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:55 pm by Barton Thompson
We have in the western United States gone from the situation where droughts occurred once every 10 or 20 years, to a situation where we never seem to leave a drought for very long before we enter into it again. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm by Margaret Wood
”  In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Troxel v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
City of Joliet and Endrew F. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court should have revived a doctrine that prohibits Congress from delegating its authority to other entities, observing that “[i]t’s not often one has the opportunity to undo an original sin. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:09 am by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court heard submissions last week on the proposed law that would ban TikTok in the US over national security concerns unless its China-based parent company sells the platform by 19 January 2025. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:10 am by SHG
  Congress did not make the reduction retroactive, while asserting that the change was needed because the law was patently unfair.As Judge Evans explained in his decision for a unanimous 7th Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
As Graber notes, my political account ends with the resignation of Richard Nixon, and a lot has gone on since then. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Hawaii: The so-called ‘Steven Tyler Act’, named after the lead singer of Aerosmith, will be considered in the state Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term Commencing March 4, 1877 1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” At The Daily Beast, Ronald Goldfarb argues that the 1967 case United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
United States, the Supreme Court used the words “obligation” and “debt” interchangeably. [read post]